For additional posts I will compose, they will be annotated on the following blog:
www.informaproject.blogspot.com
Thank you,
Dan
Taxpayers Against Fraud
Furious Seasons
Scientific Misconduct
Community Catalyist
National Physicians Alliance
Pharmagossip
Pharmalot
Pharmed Out
Blog Archive
-
►
2008
(49)
-
►
July
(22)
- Law 101 Continued: So Now You Know
- Law 101 continued: A Different Kind of Concert
- Law 101 continued: Why There is Not More Focus on ...
- Law 101: The Bribery Statute
- Law 101 Continued: Bribery Versus Gifting
- Law 101 Mid Term Period: The Size of the Lie
- Law 101 Continued: So, What's Your Price?
- Law 101 Continued: More Latin Once Again
- Law 101 Continues: Similar To Being Employed By O...
- Law 101 Continues: An Old and Uncommon Act
- Law 101 Continued: Now What Exactly Is Fraud?
- A Very Powerful Department: Law 101 Continued
- Law 101 Continued: What is a Federal Prosecutor?
- Law 101 Continued: An Act Rarely Formed
- Law 101 Continued: Now It Gets Latin
- Law 101: Anyone Ever Heard of a Relator?
- Additional Benefits of Knowledge
- M & M
- Innovation For Profit, Patient Benefit, or Both?
- Pharmaceuticals: Another P Added To the Marketing...
- The Fallacies of Government Health Care Programs
- Innovation For An Unfortunate Chronic Illness
-
►
June
(20)
- Painful Comedy
- Santa in a Suit
- Is the Pharmaeutical Industry Now A Client of the ...
- On A Personal Note
- Extending Life in a Different Way
- Demoralized
- Our R
- A Cost Issue
- It's Better To Know
- For Profit?
- Yeah, Me, Too
- Quick When You Are Sick
- Vexed By the Interruption?
- An End to the Annoyance
- Sweet Innovation
- A Real Super Drug
- Bioequivalent
- Terminally Ill
- An Intimate Relationship
- Depression and Treatment
-
►
July
(22)
About Me
- Dan Abshear
- I clearly have an affinity for anything involved with the restoration of health of others. I intend to share knowledge, personal and otherwise, with readers welcome to this blog.
1 comments:
Dan, Thank you for your comments on my blog, Pharm Aid. I typically publish all of your comments. However, on today's comment on SSRI's, I was unable to publish. While I'm supportive of 95% of your posting, you reference two dubious "scientific" studies. The first is St. John's Wort "as effective" as pharmaceutical medication has been unable to be validated in several dozen other studies. In the other, jogging provided depression relief greater than SSRIs. This study is true, although the benefit to patients was very temporary and was not lasting. Also, it is also worth noting that one of the subjects committed suicide.
As always, I welcome your comments on my blog, but I couldn't allow those two studies to be posted to the lack of scientific standing. I agree with much of what you wrote, but was unable to edit those two studies out your broader comment. Your fundamental premise is sound - prescribers should truly rule out other factors before prescribing antidepressants because these doctors can do more harm than good (I could not agree more with that last point).
Thanks again for visiting my site and I enjoy reading your perspective.
Post a Comment